Workforce and future skills

Workforce Planning During A Hiring Freeze

Workforce Planning During A Hiring Freeze

Workforce Planning During A Hiring Freeze

Workforce planning during a hiring freeze starts from the work, ranks vacancies by business consequence and gives finance costed options for each exception.

Workforce planning during a hiring freeze starts from the work, ranks vacancies by business consequence and gives finance costed options for each exception.

·

9 min read

var(--variable-s32cKztID)

Key findings

  • A backfill request is converted into demand by asking which work stops, what it costs and by when.

  • Managing a freeze by attrition shrinks the organisation in the roles that are easiest to leave, and segment-level counts show it early.

  • Vacancies are tested against four criteria, and only those that meet several go forward as costed exception cases.

  • Contractors are where frozen work moves, and a first review counts them, dates them and links each to a frozen requisition.

Refilling a role whose work has changed reinstates last year's gap and does not close this year's.

Workforce planning during a hiring freeze shifts from forecasting how many people to hire to deciding which work the existing people do.

The HR partner separates the work that must be done from the roles that used to do it and ranks vacancies by business consequence. A costed case then goes to finance for the exceptions it will accept.

Pages on strategic workforce planning usually assume growth and a horizon of three to five years.

Pages on hiring freezes tend to stop at internal mobility.

Neither describes the conversation with a business leader who has lost four people and cannot replace them.

This article gives a sequence for the first ninety days after a freeze is announced.

What A Freeze Removes

A freeze suspends the routines that normally tell the business what its workforce needs to look like.

Four effects follow, and each one shapes the first ninety days.

  • Evidence. No hiring means no time to fill, no offer acceptance and no internal movement data, so the latest benchmarks predate the freeze

  • Visibility. The work does not stop, and it moves to contractors and agencies that finance books outside headcount

  • Capability. Development budgets are often cut first, and the loss appears in no attrition report

  • Credibility. HR spent the period administering the freeze, and now asks for exceptions from people who remember the last forecast

David Edwards notes that workers supplied by third parties are rarely counted in headcount.

They are usually managed through supply chain as a non-headcount expense.

HR therefore starts the freeze without a view of a large part of the workforce.

The Work Before The Roles

A leader who has lost four people will ask to backfill four roles.

The HR partner's first move is to ask about the work.

Ross Sparkman defines internal workforce demand as the volume, skills and experience the organisation needs to operate and reach its objectives.

Work is the starting point in that definition, and the role is a later choice.

Five questions turn a backfill request into demand that can be modelled.

  • "Which work stops on the first day this role is empty?"

  • "What does that cost the customer, or the business, and by when?"

  • "Which of your commitments for the next two years are held back by capability and not by budget?"

  • "What did you stop doing during the freeze that you intend to restart?"

  • "Where are you buying capacity from outside because you could not hire it?"

The answers produce a list of work items, each with a volume, a deadline and a consequence.

Some items belong to a role that still needs filling, some can be redistributed, and some can stop.

Jen Allen, a former Police Scotland practitioner quoted by Edwards, found a skills list for police officers that included baking and basketball.

Her conclusion was to start with demand and the task.

A skills inventory built before that step catalogues the population and answers no question the leader asked.

The better order is set out in building a skills inventory from the work.

Attrition Is Not A Plan

Many freezes are managed by attrition, and the organisation shrinks by whatever the labour market takes.

People leave where their skills are best paid elsewhere, which may be where the business can least spare them.

The result is a smaller organisation that is short in the roles it can least afford to lose and overstaffed in the rest.

Sparkman notes that workforce analytics can show whether particular groups are more prone to leave.

He adds that in a restructuring, high attrition may not be seen as a problem.

Two numbers per segment show whether the freeze is being managed or merely endured.

  • Leavers since the freeze began, as a share of the segment

  • Critical roles in the segment that are now vacant or covered by a contractor

A segment where both numbers are high needs an exception case before the next resignation arrives.

Which Vacancies Are Critical

Under a freeze, every leader describes every vacancy as critical.

Sparkman gives three characteristics that typically define a critical workforce segment.

  • Skills in high demand or short supply. Inside and outside the organisation

  • Impact on the value chain. Roles in core processes such as product development or supply chain

  • Disproportionate contribution to outcomes. Innovation, customer satisfaction or operational efficiency

A fourth test suits a freeze, which is whether the work has changed enough that the old job description no longer describes it.

Refilling a role whose work has changed reinstates last year's gap and does not close this year's.

The HR partner runs each vacancy past the four tests with the leader present.

A vacancy that meets none of them is a candidate for redistribution, and one that meets several goes forward as an exception case.

For example, a service business has six open vacancies.

The dispatch planner meets three tests, because the skill is scarce, the role sits in the delivery process and customers notice a gap within days.

The second administrator meets none, and that work is redistributed across two colleagues with one weekly report retired.

Everything else is planned in aggregate, and that concession makes the first pass finishable.

The Options Before An Exception

Finance will ask what else was considered, so the exception case lists the alternatives with their costs.

Edwards sets out the choices an organisation faces when it has not planned its workforce, and each one carries a consequence.

  • Pay more to attract people. The cost base rises, which reduces margin or raises prices

  • Buy temporary capacity at higher rates. The work gets done, but employees lose the interesting work, and no skills stay in the business

  • Train existing people. They are ready in about nine months, and competitors may already be delivering

  • Hire whoever is available. New hires struggle, turnover rises and colleagues pick up the slack

  • Use AI for the task. Unplanned, it takes too long to make a difference, and retrained staff feel threatened

Jane Datta, a former chief human resources officer at NASA, told Edwards that these are not always unpalatable.

She said that contracting for a skill needed for a limited time or a surge is kinder than hiring and then firing.

Three more options belong on the list inside a freeze.

They are redeploying someone from another team, redistributing the work and stopping it.

Each option is priced, and the price is set beside the cost of leaving the work undone.

A contractor who has covered a frozen role for six months is a permanent cost being paid at a premium.

The Exception Case On One Page

The exception case has six fields, and the finance partner helps to fill in the cost fields.

  1. The work, its volume and its deadline

  2. The cost of leaving it undone, in money

  3. Each option, with its cost and duration

  4. What the requesting leader releases in exchange

  5. Who decides, and by which date

  6. When the decision is reviewed

Edwards quotes Dibyendu Sharma of Unisys.

Finance approves the budgets, Sharma said, and needed to see exactly how planning improved margin before it gave a green light.

Edwards adds that the practitioner must be as forensic and as numerate as finance.

A worked case with imagined figures shows the arithmetic.

A contractor at 600 a day for 220 days costs 132,000, against a fully loaded permanent cost of 85,000.

A contractor who has covered a frozen role for six months is a permanent cost being paid at a premium.

The finance partner sees it at once.

The same principle applies when the numbers are about supply.

David Shontz, formerly of Nokia, is quoted by Edwards on a retirement model.

It showed around 40 per cent of the US workforce leaving through retirement within ten years, before any other attrition.

A simple spreadsheet scenario on replacement bent the cost curve by 30 million euro, and business leaders started to care.

The result reached them because it was expressed in money and not as a workforce risk.

The argument for the leader is developed further in building the business case for a people programme.

Contractors During A Freeze

Because the freeze applies to permanent headcount, contractors are where the work goes.

Edwards describes a review of around 6,000 resource augmentation workers at a company he worked for.

The average statement of work covered 1.5 full-time equivalents, which meant heavy processing overhead and no volume discount.

Hiring managers were raising the statements individually so that the cost stayed below their own signing limit.

The same people were procured on a rolling basis, and much of the work was not temporary.

Once the contractors were added to headcount, external staff made up over 45 per cent of a portfolio workforce of 13,000.

Three questions produce most of the value in a first review.

  1. How many contractors work here, through which suppliers, at what rates and against which cost centres

  2. How long each has been continuously engaged

  3. Which engagements exist because a requisition was frozen and not because the work is temporary

The second question is also a compliance question.

Sparkman warns that organisations can face penalties where regulation of contractors is strict and workers are misclassified.

He also notes that mixing permanent and temporary staff creates cultural dynamics that the plan has to manage.

An anonymous practitioner quoted by Edwards described co-leading a contingent labour project.

HR came to understand the process and the vendor systems, and that built a great deal of trust.

Supply Already Inside The Business

A freeze leaves three sources of supply that need no requisition.

  • Internal movement. People who can move to a critical segment, and the managers who will release them, covered in internal mobility and the hoarding manager

  • Retirements. Who is due to leave in the next twenty-four months in each critical segment

  • Conversions. Contractors who could move to permanent roles at a lower cost

Sparkman's illustration of a five-year plan for 300 software engineers converts 150 contractors to full-time employees and hires 150 new ones.

The example shows conversion treated as a normal lever in a plan.

The First Ninety Days

The instinct after a freeze is announced is to build the whole apparatus.

A narrower sequence produces decisions earlier.

  • Days 1 to 30. List the vacancies and the work items behind them, take the contractor baseline, and agree who signs what

  • Days 31 to 60. Apply the four tests with each leader, and cost two scenarios for each critical segment with finance present

  • Days 61 to 90. Take the first exception cases to a decision with a named owner and date, and start recording hiring data

Three sign-offs are settled at the start.

The operating leader signs the demand assumptions, and finance signs the cost model.

Someone other than the talent function arbitrates when a segment plan conflicts with the budget.

Where those three exist, the plan is an operating process.

Where they do not, it remains an HR document.

Workforce Planning And Headcount Planning

Sparkman describes strategic workforce planning as a framework for comparing the current and desired states of the workforce.

The comparison runs across points in time, and it finds the gaps.

Operational planning is the short-term work of headcount management and cost control, and it usually covers six to eighteen months.

Strategic planning looks three to five years or more.

A freeze stops most of the operational activity, since there are no positions to open, and leaves the strategic questions untouched.

The practical arrangement is a cadence in which the operational cycle feeds the strategic one with actuals.

What To Promise

Edwards devotes a chapter to limiting leaders' expectations of workforce planning, and the advice applies double under a freeze.

The honest promise is narrow. It is better decisions in the segments that matter, with the cost of each option visible before it is chosen.

A function that oversells the work is measured against the promise and not against the decisions it improved.

Early Signs Of Planning By Attrition

  • Backfill requests arrive as role titles with no work attached

  • Nobody can say how many contractors work in the business

  • Every vacancy is described as critical

  • Exception requests reach finance with no costed alternatives

  • Leavers are counted in total and never by segment

Where The Tools Sit

Trusted Talent Advisor holds the diagnostic sequence behind this work in its core practitioner guide.

The case for investment is built with its evidence and impact tools.

Its template pack includes the canvases for critical role definition and for the business case that accompanies a workforce recommendation.

Related reading: job architecture, leadership pipeline risk from entry-level cuts.

Sources

1. Sparkman, R. Strategic Workforce Planning: Developing Optimized Talent Strategies for Future Growth, 2nd edition. Kogan Page.

2. Edwards, D. The Strategic Workforce Planning Handbook: Design, Implement and Measure Workforce Plans to Drive Business Results. Kogan Page.

From the system

Trusted Talent Advisor sets out the full method: seven components, 51 tools, The Talent Template Pack and The Prompt Library.

See the system

Questions this answers

What is strategic workforce planning?

It is a framework for comparing the current and desired states of the workforce across points in time, to find the gaps. Its output is a set of decisions about investment, sourcing and development, and it does not stop at a headcount number.

What should HR do during a hiring freeze?

Count the work and the contractors, test each vacancy for business consequence, and cost the alternatives. Then take the few critical vacancies to finance as exception cases, and record hiring data from the first requisition that reopens.

How do you do workforce planning when you cannot hire?

Start with demand, meaning the work that must be done, then look at supply you already hold: redeployment, retirements and contractor conversion. Redistribute or stop work that does not meet the critical tests, and plan in ninety-day windows.

How do you make a business case for a hiring freeze exception?

State the work and its deadline, price the cost of leaving it undone, cost each option, and name what the requesting leader releases in return. Build the cost fields with finance, and set a decision date and a review date.

What is the difference between workforce planning and headcount planning?

Headcount planning manages positions and cost in the short term, typically six to eighteen months. Strategic workforce planning asks what capability the strategy needs over three to five years or more, and how to build, buy or borrow it.

How long do hiring freezes usually last?

Treat the end date as unknown. Plan in ninety-day windows with a review at each, so that the plan holds whether the freeze lasts one quarter or four, and so that exceptions are decided on evidence and not on fatigue.